Samuel J. Abrams critiques Ian Bogost’s essay which portrays small elite liberal-arts colleges as thriving amid higher education challenges. Abrams argues that these institutions are not actually winning, countering the seductive narrative of their intimacy and success. The piece highlights ongoing debates in the ‘war on higher ed’ affecting small colleges.
Key Points
- Abrams responds to Bogost’s positive view of small liberal-arts colleges as ‘accidental winners’.
- Emphasizes that these elite institutions face significant challenges despite their intimate settings.
- Discusses broader implications for higher education amid perceived conflicts and changes.
Implications for Educational Freedom
This article underscores vulnerabilities in traditional higher education models, potentially bolstering arguments for greater educational freedom and choice in postsecondary options. It may empower parents and students to seek alternatives beyond elite small colleges, aligning with EFI’s focus on reducing government overreach in education.
