Samuel J. Abrams critiques Ian Bogost’s essay that portrays small, elite liberal-arts colleges as successful amid challenges in higher education. Abrams argues this view is seductive but inaccurate, suggesting these institutions are not truly winning. The piece highlights ongoing debates about the state of intimate, elite colleges in the U.S.
Key Points
- Abrams responds to Bogost’s positive depiction of small liberal-arts colleges
- Bogost describes them as intimate winners in the ‘war on higher ed’
- Abrams contends this portrait is misleading and they are not succeeding
Implications for Educational Freedom
This critique underscores potential vulnerabilities in higher education options, which could impact parental rights and choices in selecting colleges for their children. It may highlight the need for greater educational freedom through alternatives like vouchers or expanded access to diverse post-secondary institutions.
