Two new states have mandated cursive instruction in schools, but the article argues that the benefits are overstated. It critiques the push for such requirements, suggesting they may not be as educationally valuable as claimed. The piece appeared on Education Next, highlighting ongoing debates in educational policy.
Key Points
- Two states recently mandated cursive teaching in K-12 education.
- The mandates overstate the cognitive and practical benefits of cursive.
- Critics argue that such requirements may not align with evidence-based education priorities.
Implications for Educational Freedom
This highlights potential government overreach in dictating curriculum details, which could limit school choice and parental rights by imposing uniform standards. EFI might advocate for more flexibility in educational approaches to empower parents and reduce state mandates.
