Samuel Goldman argues in the Chronicle of Higher Education that universities are failing to address public skepticism effectively. Instead of engaging with concerns, they rely on appeals to their own authority, which proves ineffective. This approach exacerbates the disconnect between higher education institutions and the public.
Key Points
- Universities respond to skepticism by asserting their authority.
- This strategy is not working and leads to further loss of public trust.
- The article highlights the need for better engagement with public concerns.
Implications for Educational Freedom
This loss of trust in universities underscores the importance of educational freedom and alternatives to traditional higher education, potentially empowering parents and students through school choice mechanisms like vouchers or charters extended to postsecondary options. It highlights government overreach in education, advocating for greater parental rights in selecting institutions that align with family values.
