The article explores whether small colleges are pursuing unreliable markets instead of sticking to their traditional residential models. It questions the reliability of these alternative markets compared to core offerings. The discussion highlights potential pitfalls in chasing subsidies or new segments.
Key Points
- Small colleges may be shifting away from core residential models toward less reliable markets.
- The article questions if these pursued markets offer more stability than traditional approaches.
- Potential ‘subsidy trap’ could impact long-term viability of small institutions.
Implications for Educational Freedom
This could highlight government overreach through subsidies distorting higher education markets, limiting true school choice and parental empowerment in selecting affordable, quality options. It underscores the need for market-driven freedom over subsidized models in higher ed.
Source: The subsidy trap: Are small colleges chasing the wrong markets?
